NINOFF
1. Which best describes your connection to a UK charity?
2. Approximate annual income of your charity
3. In principle, how useful could stronger public financial transparency be to your organisation?
4. Could stronger financial transparency help a smaller or less well-known charity reassure potential donors?
5. In principle, would your organisation consider publishing underlying expenditure information rather than only high-level annual figures?
6. Which levels of transparency might your organisation be comfortable publishing? Choose any.
7. What would concern your organisation most about this kind of transparency? Choose any.
8. Neutral allocation principle

NINOFF is intended to allocate donor contributions against eligible expenditure using system-controlled rules, so charities cannot choose particularly attractive spending stories for individual donors. How would your organisation feel about this principle?

9. What level of additional administration would your organisation realistically tolerate for this type of transparency?
10. If NINOFF could work mainly from financial records your organisation already maintains, how important would that be to adoption?
11. If NINOFF were free or very low-cost for smaller charities, how much difference would that make to whether your organisation considered participating?
12. If NINOFF became recognised by donors as a meaningful transparency signal, how valuable would displaying that signal be to your organisation?
13. Which accounting or bookkeeping system does the charity currently use?
14. If NINOFF could produce this level of transparency mainly from existing financial records without significant additional bookkeeping, would your organisation seriously consider an early pilot?

This asks about serious consideration, not a commitment.

Optional follow-up

Leave this blank to remain anonymous. If you want to discuss feedback or a possible pilot, tick the box and provide an email.