NINOFF Demo

Public fund perspective

Community Meals Fund

Riverside Community Kitchen · charity no. FICT-104821

Reporting period1 Mar 2026 – 31 Aug 2026
Demo disclosure: Riverside Community Kitchen, its suppliers, contributions, expenditure and evidence are example data. They do not describe real organisations, people, payments or documents.

Money raised to prepare and serve affordable, nutritious meals for local residents during spring and summer 2026.

Private donor perspective

Your donation

£15.00 received

A real donor would reach this private perspective through a secure reference, without their identity appearing publicly.

Private referenceDEMO-8D4AF364

Received on

9 Apr 2026

Fund

Community Meals Fund

Receipt source

Online Giving

Current receipt state

Received

Whole-fund perspective

All covered money in this fund

Received

£12,450.00

Across 34 contributions

Matched to eligible records

£9,880.00

Prototype calculation · 79.4%

Held in fund

£2,570.00

Available for future eligible costs under this restricted purpose. It is not treated as failure or expenditure.

Aggregate balance79.4% matched to eligible expenditure

The contribution movements reconcile exactly to the expenditure records below.

Record source

Manually prepared

Balance check

Ledger movements reconcile

Evidence

Metadata supplied

Independent review

Not performed

Level 2 · Expenditure records

What sits underneath each category?

The records below are the same records summed into the category and whole-fund totals. Sensitive detail is labelled and bounded rather than removed from the money story.

Category

Food programme costs

£4,400.003 underlying records

Category

Premises

£1,600.002 underlying records

Category

Staff supporting delivery

£1,500.001 underlying record

Category

Transport

£1,480.003 underlying records

Category

Administration & protected detail

£900.002 underlying records

Interpretation

Facts to inspect, not a command to trust.

What passed

Received equals matched expenditure plus held value.

What is not asserted

No underlying activity or document has been audited or authenticated.

Disclosure

Redaction may protect legitimate sensitivity, but every amount remains in the totals.

Privacy

Donor names and contact details are absent from the public view.

You have explored the example

Tell us what you think of NINOFF.

The donor survey takes about three minutes and is anonymous. Honest negative feedback is useful.

Share your view, 3 minutes →